Balmar SG200, a good battery monitor gets better

Balmar’s Chris Witzgall stands with the SG-200 display at IBEX

I recently judged the Innovation Awards at the International Boat Builders’ Exposition (IBEX) and we selected the new Balmar SG200 battery monitor as the winner of the Electrical Products category.  The SG200 combines the goodness of the highly regarded original Smartgauge with a shunt to deliver a more complete picture of what your batteries are doing.

The first generation Smartgauge differed from almost every other battery monitor on the market by measuring a battery bank’s State of Charge (SoC) using just two voltage wires.  This meant that while the Smartgauge could tell you how charged your batteries were — somehow with more accuracy than more complex current counters according to power expert Rod Collins — it couldn’t tell you how much power was being used or replaced in real-time.  This lack of insight into consumption and charging was a significant limiting factor to many users.  Coupled with a very simple numeric-only display and the lack of support for lithium battery chemistries, there was definitely room for an update.

Enter the SG200.  Balmar has streamlined the user interface to a 2-inch, sunlight-readable color display.  It links to a sensor module named the SmartShunt via a 4-pin network connection called SmartLink. Since SmartLink allows the connection of 32 devices, you can monitor a large number of battery banks with displays located throughout the boat.  Each SmartShunt can also monitor voltage for two auxiliary batteries, like engine start or similar non-deep-cycle applications.

With the SG200, Balmar has begun measuring your battery bank’s State of Health (SoH), which is delivered as a percentage representing the battery bank’s current capacity versus design capacity.  The SG200 also reports on current consumption and total time remaining for the battery bank.  A mix of what Balmar calls active impedance compensation and shunt-based monitoring is used to deliver this level of insight.

Balmar says the SG200 can accurately measure State of Charge and State of Health for all major battery types including Lead Acid, AGM, Carbon Foam, TPPL and LiFePO4.  According to Chris Witzgall, the product manager for the SG200, it takes about three charge cycles for the SG200 to fully learn your battery bank’s characteristics and be able to accurately report on its status.  Unlike the original Smartgauge, the SG200 purportedly doesn’t lose accuracy while charging, and over time the system will get more accurate withut requiring calibration like typical coulomb counting shunt-based monitors.

Balmar’s planned options for the SG200 system include a Bluetooth gateway that will support a mobile app and a NMEA-2000 gateway that will make battery status and other metrics available on connected N2K instruments and MFDs. The basic SG200 gauge and shunt kit sells for $239 with limited availability until January, and the gateway prices aren’t yet known. Balmar has put up a good SG200 video here.

I’m hoping to install a SG200 on Have Another Day soon and look forward to reporting on the monitor’s ability to deliver on all the promise it shows.

Similar Posts:

Smartgauge battery monitor, RC proclaims “paradigm shift”!
April 23, 2014

Xtreme Marine, pulse charging
October 9, 2007

Gizmo 12v power issues, dumb questions?
July 6, 2010

Xtreme QuadLink, and the Victron N2K Skylla charger
July 18, 2012

Ben Stein

Ben Stein

Publisher of, passionate marine electronics enthusiast, completed the Great Loop in 2017.

81 Responses

  1. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Balmar’s new Smartguage looks really good to me. For one thing, a battery bank’s State of Health is quite important because you can not have accurate State of Charge if the bank no longer has the capacity it was meant to.

    Also, I’m happy to report that the SG200 is doing well so far in lab testing by Rod Collins: “It is pretty cool and so far on LiFePO4 the thing is posting within 1% on both SOH and SOC. That to me is quite amazing. One will be going on my own boat as soon as I can get a production model as Ah counters just don’t cut it.”

    Support Rod’s work here:

  2. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    According to Balmar’s Facebook page, the SG200 is “currently under a limited release…with full production launching January 1st” and those units are only available at PKYS:

  3. Lauren says:

    I would be curious to see how this works for people who run 100% renewable as for the charging. We lived on the hook for several years with both LiFePO4 batteries and a large solar array. the variable charging nature of solar and wind really seemed to confuse algorithms used. We cruised a few years ago, so had a link 20 and a BMV602, and after months of tweaking, found the victron to be slightly closer to the truth, but there were times where both got confused and reported wrong, but different situations confused them differently so having a second opinion was nice! Luckily we we had way more solar than we needed to keep charge and I understood what was going on, but I am curious if Balmar’s secret sauce actually works better in this scenario.

    • Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

      Well, the original Smartgauge definitely has an unusual way of tracking SoC — apparently termed “active impedance compensation” (I learned while editing this entry) — and according to Rod Collins there’s just no way that current counting alone can maintain accurate SoC over time.

      In my experience the 1st gen Smartgauge can get slightly confused when solar gain is high, but once the sun is down it’s much more accurate than my boat’s BMV (though it has umpteen adjustments I may have wrong ;-). Hopefully, the SG200 has it all completely right.

  4. Richard Cassano says:

    So, how do you program 32 devices? Is this done with push button codes? The Smartguage buttons are a nightmare to work with – some button presses work and sometimes not. I’ll wait for Rods report before I upgrade. Right now I’m happy to at least see the voltage on my house bank and starter battery.

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:


      Although the system has capacity for 32 devices, it’s hard for me to see a scenario where you’d be programming more than a small handful of SmartShunts. The new display has a single button and during my brief time at the booth using a demo unit I didn’t find any difficulty in getting it to respond to button pushes. Balmar uses a combination of short taps to change settings and long presses to confirm. It worked fine but is obviously quite limited in what settings can be changed this way. I’m guessing the mobile app will probably allow greater customization like naming of banks and the like.

      • Richard Cassano says:

        Great, that’s what I was hoping for, an App that allows programming rather than button pushes. I’ll never be programming 32 devices but for those with complex systems a programmable App would be welcome. Button pushing seems so primitive.

      • Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

        Actually, Balmar’s video briefly shows an SG200 app screen where you can custom name the shunts, the gauges, and the gateways. The narration also mentions that you can put shunts on loads like thrusters or refrigeration, so I think it’s possible to get that little display to show some sophisticated information in plain English. Check 2:44 here:

  5. Tim Leighton says:

    I’m encouraged that Balmar has joined the newer “family” of smarter shunt-based battery monitors. While I was happy with my SmartGage on our old sailboat I always wished it provided more information. Last spring the LINK system on our new-to-us Krogen 48 trawler died and I opted for the Victron 702 monitor which was very easy to install and has worked extremely well for us. I wonder what the differences are between those two systems.

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:


      The biggest difference is that the Victron system is strictly coulomb counting. As a result it’s prone to drifting out of accuracy and doesn’t have any idea what age has done to the capacity of the battery bank it’s monitoring. If you told it you have a 1,000ah bank but age has reduced your capacity to 800ah it’s still assuming you have 1,000ah available.

  6. Leslie Troyer says:

    I ordered one in Annapolis – hope they make the Bluetooth API available. It would be nice to track this with Signalk. They said it will be delivered end of this month.

  7. Grant says:

    “…and a NMEA-2000 gateway that will make battery status and other metrics available on connected N2K instruments and MFDs.”
    That’s maybe the best news of all – right now, trying to monitor multiple battery bank voltages using NMEA2000 requires buying a separate NMEA2000 voltage monitor for each bank. The only product I know of that does that is Maretron’s DCM100 at $495 MSRP – plus an additional Maretron device to program them (USB100, etc.)
    For a twin-engine boat with genset, its not uncommon to have 4 battery banks – so that’s over $2,000 just to read battery voltage on a NMEA 2000 display! I’m glad somebody finally addressed this, to say nothing of the other capabilities of the SG200. Looking forward to seeing it soon!

  8. Rick R says:

    Can this be used to trigger an Automatic Generator Start at say 50% SOC, and is there an audible alarm to draw attention to a fault or alert? I didn’t see either in the owners manual.

    Balmar needs to hurry up and include bluetooth with every unit, since Victron 702 has had this feature for several years. Hopefully the SG 200 prompts Victron to add a battery State of Health feature.

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      Looking through the specs and wiring diagrams I don’t see a relay output of any sort. That would be one way to enable generator starting at a given SOC. Without that, I think the most likely way to achieve this would be with NMEA-2000 output and then use a device that monitors the PGN for SOC and takes action when it crosses a threshold. Not a simple solution.

      Right now it seems like Balmar is on the same path as Victron was with the 702, Bluetooth being an add-on option (on the BMV-702 it connects to the VE.NET port) but the BMV-712 now has it built in.

  9. Anonymous says:

    Whats the relationship to Merlin Equipment, who made the original smartgauge, as Balmar were just rebranding it for the US market.

    I’m in the UK, will I be able to get it from Merlin, or are they not involved in the SG200?

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      My understanding is that Balmar has engineered the SG-200 themselves and I don’t believe Merlin was involved. I haven’t heard anything about any agreements with Merlin for them to sell it in the UK but I’ll reach out and ask.

  10. Saffy The Pook says:

    I sure hope that every configuration setting can be made without the need for the app & bluetooth module. I have no need or desire for the bluetooth module otherwise and having to pay extra just to set the thing up is a deal breaker for me.

  11. Hi all, I’m the funny looking guy at the top of the post. I figured I would attempt to answer a few of the questions here. While there are some similarities at how the original SmartGauge calculates SoC compared to the SG200, there are some big differences. Note we are not calling this SmartGauge 2, or something like that.

    Active Impedance Compensation is not something the SmartGauge does, only the SG200. It should have no issues with Solar and lower amperage charging sources. Although we may find a use for it in the future, Peukert is not used to calculate SoC. This is important because it is actually kinda hard to get this number right, and it is actually not constant, but varies as batteries age, and as even as they charge and discharge. We are currently only using it for Time Remaining.

    A N2k and or Canbus connectivity is something we anticipate adding in the future. Although there is a State of Health PGN, the only place I think it is view-able is on a Maretron display.

    Additional shunts are viable to use to monitor any load or charging source, but when it comes to SoH on a battery or bank, we need to see a cycling, both charge and discharge over time, to make that calculation. This is why we are not recommending a Separate SmartShunt for starter batteries.


    Programming the devices is pretty darn simple. Just select a chemistry, and then the design capacity of the battery or bank. That is it. Additionally, you can define alerts for the difference SmartShunts. There is currently no audio buzzer or sound alert, only on screen. We have some ideas about a I/O or relay module, this could be incorporated in that.

  12. Grant Jenkins says:

    Chris, thanks for the clarifications. Really hoping you can program it to output at least a basic PGN (127506 or 508) containing even just DC Volts for display on other NMEA2000 displays. Look forward to seeing the product at the Seattle show perhaps in January?

  13. Ted Arisaka says:

    I hope the BT connected app technology can be leveraged to program a future version of you MC614 external regulator. I stole Rod Collins idea of programming it off the boat, but I still need the instruction manual in front of me and that darn screwdriver with the magnetic tip 🙂

  14. Ian Kelly says:

    Hmm – seems like a move in the right direction
    is it know if this device will talk with the original smart bank ? ( the brother to the smart guage?)
    major pity if this didn’t have this funcionality

  15. Leslie Troyer says:

    Got the display installed today an the cable run to the battery compartment. Next is shunt install and testing.

  16. Saffy The Pook says:

    Any idea what the shunt resistance is? I have an existing 50mV/500A shunt for my inverter/charger and would have to either put it in series with the Smart Shunt (which I don’t want to do) or just use the SS in place of my current shunt and have it do double duty by putting the charger’s sense wires across the Smart Shunt but I could only do that if it matches the specs of the current one.

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      Saffy, I’ve reached out to Balmar to see if they can provide that information. I’ll let you know if i hear back or Chris might chime in directly here.

    • Saffy,

      While our shunt is compatible from a resistance standpoint, this is not something we have tested for and it very well could really mess things up with some of our internal calculations done in the SmartShunt. We are measuring a very tiny voltage at a high degree of accuracy, anything that throws that would be very detrimental to the SG200 operation. Much more so than a traditional coloumb counting shunt.

      Having said that, there is no issue with putting the SmartShunt in series with another shunt.While i may not be the most elegant solution, we have done this with no inpact to the SG200 performance.

      • Saffy The Pook says:

        Thanks, Chris. Series is an option if there’s no alternative.

      • Jorgen says:

        I also look forward to replacing the smarthauge (and perhaps even Maratron ) with this new devise.
        But why is it that this new design does not use coils (such as Maretron) to measure current so that the user do not have to cut the conducting cable?

        • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

          Perhaps Chris will chime in on this but I believe (at least part of) the reason is that in order to measure resistance as the SG-200 does they need hard connections to the battery and not just the flow of current as a typical CT does.

  17. Saffy The Pook says:

    Thanks, Ben.

  18. Peter Jung says:

    My house battery bank (2, 8D AGMs) is now two years old, and has undergone significant charge/discharge cycles in those two years. Short of doing a 20-hour rate discharge test on my existing battery bank to establish the current SOH of my bank, how will it determine SOH of an “experienced” battery bank such as mine?

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      According to Balmar that’s the magic of the SG-200. Their algorithms will know what the characteristics of an aged battery look like and evaluate your battery based on those characteristics to determine its actual capacity. I haven’t had the chance to evaluate that on my boat yet but expect to do so in the next month or so. I also have an experienced bank made up of 8 FLA GC2 batteries.

    • Pete and All,
      Pete sent in a request for this information to our support email so I responded to him there. I am posting it here, since he asked here too:


      I received your request for more information about how the SG200 works, specifically when connected to aged batteries. Over several charge/discharge cycles, the Monitor will establish the SoH of the battery or bank. The number of cycles is not set in stone, but typically is from 2-6 cycles. Note that the accuracy of this is will be skewed if the battery does not receive at least one full charge, all the way to the top. For instance, it it calculated that your SoH is 92%, but the charging was stopped when 2% of the usable capacity was not “Charged’ then the SoH will be off by that 2%.

      Based on some continuing testing we are doing, we may be able to document a procedure to shorten the time needed to get a good SoH figure.


  19. Anonymous says:

    Hi Ben,

    Well, huh. I’m hopeful Balmar will provide some amplifying details of how their algorithm “queries” the battery bank to determine SOH. I’ve asked them, no answer to date. As I expect the algorithms and hardware are intensely proprietary, I’m not hopeful for much of an answer. Perhaps Rod Collins will weigh in here, or on his web site.

    If Balmar’s assertion proves to be correct and accurate, seems like a further variant of the SG200 would obviate 99% of the SOH “battery testers” currently in use today by battery retailers, auto repair shops, Harbor Freight, NAPA, and a myriad of others. The vast majority of which, IMHO, seem simply worthless.

    The SG200 seems REALLY promising, and I’m tempted to acquire one ASAP. Kudos to Balmar! And thanks to you for the heads up on this instrument.



  20. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Happy to report that I encountered two more battery monitors claiming to deduce battery State of Health at METS. One is a Scheiber Intelligent Battery Monitor kit now being sold in the U.S. by MarineBeam, who also explain it well:

    The other is not yet described online but Sentinel Marine Solutions has new IBS (Intelligent Battery Sensor) that can output results over NMEA 2000 as well as off boat:

    • Hi Ben,
      The Sentinel Marine unit seems to be simply a voltage sensor – it would let you know if you are low/high (along with lots of other things – it seems to be primarily a security device). The Scheiber unit looks more interesting, but appears to be limited to post-type batteries, as mounting their sensor on a tab-type battery like my Lifeline 8Ds wouldn’t work without significant kludgery 🙁 .

      It strikes me that many of the folks looking at these units probably already have one or more shunts installed for an existing amp-counter device — it would be nice if these things could be configured to use these existing shunts, making installation much simpler!

      • We actually had an early prototype that mounted directly onto a battery stud (Not post). We moved away from that, mostly because it made the battery installation taller, and from my experience that was something that would limit installation in many circumstances. We also made the choice not to use an already available automotive sensor for performance (max Amp draw etc).

        If we were just measuring current flow, then using existing shunts would have been an option. However we are also making other measurements including impedance, and we require a factory calibrated package for our performance targets.

        • Hi Chris.
          I do understand regarding a standardized connection.
          Two questions: first, are the terminals on the SmartShunt 3/8″? Second, your diagram seems to show that the start/aux battery negatives run through the shunt – wouldn’t the starting (or running, like for a thruster) current and charging current to the start/aux batteries confuse the readout of other currents in the system?

          • Leslie Troyer says:

            The shunt in the SG200 is what Balmar calls a smart shunt. It does contain a normal shunt, but also contains a microprocessor that does all the math and necessary calculations for monitoring the battery. The microprocessor must have two “spare” analogue to digital converters.
            The unit uses thes to measure the voltage of the other batterie sets. Electrically they are isolated from the actual shunt proper.

          • Hi Leslie,
            That’s what I would have thought, but if you look at the diagram above (it’s also on BalMar’s website) you will see that they have wired the start/aux battery negatives through the shunt as well. Perhaps this is a drafting error, but it could be significant.

          • On a standard installation utilizing the auxiliary leads, we assume that there is a common ground. If not, then additional leads will need to be installed from the aux battery back to the SmartShunt. If you read the note, it states “Negative leads on Aux. Batteries are Only Needed on Isolated Ground Systems”.
            This won’t be the case on most installations, It will work fine just running one of the orange aux leads to the positive side of the aux battery. Don’t forget to install a fuse there, sized for the wire run (there is no appreciable current flowing.)

            An additional note about fuses. Some may wonder why we include a 10a fuse for the shunt/system power, when it draws much less power. The fuse is sized for the wire properly, and we have found that there is a decent different between the resistance of a 1a fuse and a 10a fuse, so the voltage readings are a bit more accurate.

  21. Ian Kelly says:

    Hey Anonymous Pete – its probably not BALMARS IP – they have been using the smart gauge monitor from the UK for years see – – my guess is that this bit of magic actually belongs to Merlin. again a guess they will be manufacturing under license condition.

  22. Jonathan Woytek says:

    Someone had previously asked about differences between the SG200 and the Victron BMV 700 series devices. In addition to the important tech differences, it is interesting to note that the BMV712 specs quote a 1mA draw, and the SG200 specs quote a 10mA draw in sleep mode (both at 12V).

    I’m currently evaluating battery monitors for a new-to-me sailboat. The existing DC system is pretty simple with an older shunt-based energy monitor installed. Im going to be adding some new loads with nav electronics, and have an eye to install some solar charging in the future. I want to have a good handle on the existing battery bank first, though. Thanks for bringing the SG200 into my evaluation process!

    • Johnathan,

      There are some savings in power we can implement, it is on our future development list. While I am not sure we will ever get down to 1ma, it should be a good percentage savings. Our processor is much more capable (needed for our performance criteria), but that comes at a cost.

      • Jonathan Woytek says:

        Thanks for the reply, Chris! That’s great to hear that there could be some future savings there, too. Certainly, 10mA is not a deal-breaking number. It represents only about 240mA per day, or about 7A over the course of a month. In my use case, since I live in an area that freezes over the winter, the boat will be on the hard out of season, and I’ll be depending on doing some solar-based battery maintenance while out of the water.

        Does the unit have an automatic low-voltage shutdown to avoid killing a battery in the event of loss of long-term loss of charging current?

  23. PaulGel says:

    Now if Balmar would do a remote monitor for their regulators rather than a red light on the dash panel then I would sign up. I hate sitting in the engine room waiting for all three of them to cycle through their processes.

    How about it Balmar? Maybe even Bluetooth.

  24. Leslie Troyer says:

    Early adopters of the SG200 will get them free later this month. In order to hit the fall shows they shipped not knowing if the firmware was 100%. The only way to update the firmware is via Bluetooth.

  25. Tony van Wouw says:

    Not really ready for prime time yet, disappointed with the performance.
    I installed mine about a month ago and found that the state of health reading is unstable. I know from doing a 20 hr discharge test that the battery capacity is about 70AH. Although the meter does sometimes show SOH at 68% it also flips back to 100% for no apparent reason. This affects the SOC reading which is then wildly inaccurate.
    I have spoken to Chris and emailed my findings to him… I feel like an accidental product beta tester. The only solution that I see is a new firmware upgrade which is not feasible until they get the Bluetooth bugs figured out.
    Don’t really want or need the Bluetooth interface I just want it to work reliably. What I have now is a very expensive voltmeter/ammeter
    My installation is really simple… a single 100AH gel cell and a mastervolt 50A smart charger.

  26. The SG200 was over three years in the making, involving over 2500 hours of battery testing in our lab. It also included a group of external testers, with many different battery types and installations. Despite all this testing, we knew there might be conditions or situations that we and our testers did not encounter.

    We are aware of the issue with the State of Health mentioned. Essentially, the SG200 has calculated an SoH that is a “Correct Value” however, in certain circumstances the control software replaces the “Correct Value” with a 100% value. We can address this in a firmware update.

    Currently our development team is devoting all their time to getting the Bluetooth Gateway and associated App ready for the marketplace. We need this functionality in place before any other issues can be addressed, as downloads from the Gateway App are THE method for updating the software and fixing any bugs.

  27. Anonymous says:

    Is there a way to update the software without the bluetooth accessory? I shouldn’t have to pay extra for the ability to install updates to correct product deficiencies.

  28. Paul L. Bellefontaine says:

    Is a 500 amp shunt an adequate size for a vessel that has it’s bow and stern thrusters and starting motor feeding through the one negative line to it? I have a Mainship 400 with sidepower thrusters and am installing a Xantrax LInk Pro. The shunt looks to be pretty lightly built relative to the massive battery cables.

  29. Paul,

    I cannot say about the Xantrex shunt, but the Balmar SmartAhunt can handle 350a continuously, and 600a for 10 minutes. I don’t think any recreational thruster could draw that much for 10 minutes, it would overheat and shut down way before then.

    • I am in the process of building out a whole new DC battery system and monitoring, and was seriously considering the SG200 but for this limitation. 350A continuous is pretty low compared to every other shunt I have come across, which usually top out at 500A minimum.

      Considering that an average 3000W inverter from the likes of Magnum, Victron, and MasterVolt require a 350-400A fuse alone, this seems like a really big issue, requiring two SG200 shunts, bus bars, and a lot more wiring and potential failure points.

      I know a lot of the brains are in the shunt, but it would have been nice for it to be the same size amperage wise as all of the rest of them out there. Surprising, since power systems and batteries continue to get smaller and more intense….

      • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:


        I’m not sure the ratings of the Balmar shunt will provide any trouble, even in the case of a 3000w inverter running at pretty high loads. I’ve never seen house bank loads sit even at 300a for any sustained period of time. Certainly an occasional microwave or coffee maker load for relatively short periods of time will push into that range as will thrusters, but not for 10 minutes even at 300a let alone the 600a Balmar says is safe for up to 10 minutes. I will say, I think Balmar’s way of rating the shunt makes the comparison difficult but, I think the implication of it being safe for 10 minutes at 600a implies it can also measure 600a loads, which might make it more like a 600a /50mv shunt. I’ve not seen ratings on other shunts given in sustained and peak currents.


        • Thanks Ben. The reality of our rating was that we could not hold 600a for longer than 10 minutes in the lab, so we stuck with that rating. Our criteria is the internal temperature of critical components in the Smartshunt, and they were still at safe levels in that 10 minute period.

          It may also be interesting to note that many manufacturers use complete shunt assemblies made overseas, that are rated by the supplier. We assemble ours in our plant located in Huntsville, AL.

          We also hope to have a provision for ganging up shunts in parallel to increase the ratings to 700a/1200a respectively, in software. This would require the use of the BT gateway, coming soon.

          You spot on about the inverter loads, though. Most 3000w inverters will self throttle back on the available current way before the 10 minute mark. I have a Victron 24v inverter (Great unit) on my boat, and there is no way it will hold 3000w for long periods. The heat will limit it. We also have the 12v version in the lab, and perhaps we will test this in the future.

        • I think 600A is fine for short time periods, but I am still going to have issues with the 350A number. I have 2x 200A alternators plus a 120A charger that can be running simultaneously while underway which would give me 520A. The alternators won’t be running flat out all the time, but even if they are running at 150A each, that is 420A total. Remove the charger, and I’m at 300A, but that doesn’t count solar, which is being installed later this year, and any other charge sources. My house loads are not terribly high, but that has to be factored in as well. Any of those scenarios have me over their 350A number.

          Since it is a LiFePO4 bank I’m charging, I will be charging for less time than a traditional bank, so there is that, but it still will be more than 10 minutes. And I am curious how useful an SG200 would be with LiFePO4 anyhow…

          I have seen a Victron 3000W inverter on my previous boat get right up to 300 amps regularly when using an espresso maker + other normal outlets and devices. If we take that, which usually lasts a few minutes, plus a moderate house load, you could easily be over 350A for longer than 10 minutes.

          Regardless, I never like designing anything where I am regularly exceeding a limit in the case where something could fail / catch fire. I have also never seen any other shunt list a sustained current vs. max and have seen Victron and Magnum 500A/50mV shunts run at 400+ amps continuously without any issues.

          • Steve,

            I assume it is a reasonably large LiFepo4 bank? With those charging sources, I would wait until we have the 2-shunt parallel scheme up and running. At those amperages, getting 100% crimps on cables etc become very important. Have you considered changing to a 24v system?

          • Hi Chris,
            For some reason I can’t reply to your comment, so I’m replying to mine…

            I will definitely look for the 2-shunt solution in the future.

            I did consider switching to 24V but as the boat has so many things already at 12V, and using DC-DC converters would have required quite a bit more complexity, I stayed with 12V. There are definite advantages in terms of cable sizes, amperages, and the like, but it just didn’t work out in this particular install.

          • Grant Jenkins says:

            Steve, I’m curious how you plan to combine all your charging capacity into a single bank – I suppose you could use a Balmar Centerfielder and appropriate Balmar regulators to combine the outputs from your alternators, but how are you adding the battery chargers output into the mix? And would you really be running your genset while underway, just to run the battery charger? I’m not sure that just adding the sum of your various charging sources outputs’ is realistic in considering the potential loads the shunt might see…

          • Hi Grant,
            I am using a regulator system from another vendor which I will be writing about soon. It is similar to the Balmar MC-614 + Centerfielder approach but uses a few more pieces of data when charging, and in testing has shown to be very effective with two engines + two alternators. Those alternators are both directly connected to the house bank, not to the start bank and then ACRs, etc.

            I expect that setup to pump out about 300 amps continuously while underway, but of course I am going to wait to 100% confirm that until I have some time on the water with that solution.

            I do routinely run my generator while underway for a few reasons. First, my watermaker requires it to be on to make water, and on longer trips, I do that every day for a couple of hours. Second, my water heater only heats off of shore or generator, so usually in the morning we run it for an hour for showers and dishes. On top of that, we run it whenever I am using the windlass for anchoring to ensure that battery bank is topped up as the windlass eats quite a bit.

            So, if we’re running the generator at any of those points while we’re also motoring, I would definitely have 420 amps of inbound battery charge easily (300 from alternators, 120 from Victron). I could configure the Victron to not charge while the engines are charging, but why? If the generator is already on, I should be loading it as much as possible to get the best use out of the fuel being burned, and charge the batteries a bit faster.

            There are two other DC to DC chargers that use the house bank as their source, and charge the generator and start battery banks. I chose this configuration over having other AC chargers because it allows for simpler charging whether at the dock or underway, and ensures I can always start my engines and generator.

  30. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Sounds like Rod Collins at Marine How To has tested all sorts of batteries with the SG200 and is happy with results:

  31. Grant Jenkins says:

    Thanks for your response – I’ll be interested to see your report on this other vendors hardware, which apparently allows simultaneous DC charging from 2 alternators, PLUS an additional AC powered battery charger (or inverter/charger). I have not seen this anywhere. More typically, I see folks connecting two internally-regulated alternators into a single house bank, blissfully unaware that they are NOT getting anything close to the combined alternators output that they think they are… As far as what I’ve seen to date, Balmar’s solution is the only one that actually addresses this configuration.
    As far as using the genset underway for charging – sure, if you’re running it anyhow for the watermaker, why not? I’m just not aware of how you manage that charging, combined with the alternators output (especially for newer technology banks like carbon foam or LiFePO4) to achieve the specific charge profile required.
    I’m also curious about your last statement, regarding DC-DC chargers from your house bank to the gen and start banks – if it’s all 12V, why not just use an ACR? Unless your DC-DC charger supports some kind of individualized, programmable charge profiles? Again, not something I’ve seen much about….

    • Grant,
      The other hardware is supposed to be able to handle dual alternators and use more information than a traditional system to allow for not only their charging, but other charge sources. Dual alternators with decent regulators will work mostly fine up until the last portion of charging in my experience. There are some situations where the regulators will also fight eachother, or one will work and the other won’t. This system solves that, so I will be very interested to see the overall performance.

      In terms of the charging profile, I’m supposed to be able to match the inverter charger profile with the regulator, but that is something I will be working on this next week. There may be some conflicts in this situation, and if that is the case, then I’ll wire a cutoff for when the regulators are running to make sure the inverter isn’t charging as well.

      The DC-DC chargers are a product I’ve used a number of times before from Sterling Power. They are going to consume 12v DC from the house bank, and output 12v DC for my start and generator banks. There will be two of these devices, and they have a full charge profiles so I can ensure that my nice AGM start batteries are being charged nicely. I’ve done the ACR thing before and you’re essentially at the mercy of whatever charge profile your house bank / other charge source is set to. I’ve used these in other situations where charging profiles are important, or where you are stepping down/up voltages, such as for a windlass bank.

  32. Jenkins Grant says:

    Steve, thanks for your response. Sounds like a very advanced system. I’ll look forward to hearing how the new hardware performs, when you’ve had a chance to use it.
    I like the idea of the Sterling chargers, if they allow individual output profiles – as you point out, that is the downfall of traditional ACR’s when combining batteries of different technologies. I’ll check them out. Thanks!

  33. Jman says:

    Is there any guarantee that a particular brand of 12v lifepo4 drop in will work well? There are about a dozen brands outside of NA, if balmar didnt test them will they work? I ask as it looks like the sg200 has soh and soc accuracy issues with some 12v agms which are not true deep cycle.

  34. John says:

    On April 16 Chris Wetzgall of Balmar said “Currently our development team is devoting all their time to getting the Bluetooth Gateway and associated App ready for the marketplace. We need this functionality in place before any other issues can be addressed, as downloads from the Gateway App are THE method for updating the software and fixing any bugs.”

    Yet, we have no BT module yet, and therefore no bug fixes for units in the field. Another sailing season on the East Coast has come, and almost gone, without an update.

    Or perhaps there is an update I’m not aware of?

  35. Leslie Troyer says:

    I’m surprised by the lack of communication from Balmar. They know who purchased with promise of the gateway so they can contact us. Communication seems to be Internet forums or here from people who called to inquire on status. This is an example of very poor customer service.

    If you want another I inquired about a serpentine belt kit for my 83 C36 with a M25 engine. It is marketed specifically for the M25. The response after providing pictures of my crank pulley was “we don’t make one for that year of M25” – I know for a fact that the same pulley was use until 1987 – more than 80% the life of the M25 but no mention of this on their product page or what you need to look for before ordering.

    Really poor customer Orientation.

    • John says:

      Watch your step, Les! I was banned from sailboatowners today, apparently for expressing my opinion on Balmar too strongly. Or maybe RC took offense. We’ll see.

      • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

        We aren’t much into banning here. Keep it civil and avoid name calling and all will be well. I haven’t seen anything problematic so far.

        • John says:

          Thank you, Ben. Just to be clear, I wasn’t warning Les about a ban on this site. I appreciate your open discussion policy.

      • Saffy The Pook says:

        Seriously? I buy a fair amount of stuff from sailboatowners but if this is their response to a civil but critical commont, I’ll have to reconsider. Likewise for RC, who seems to have stepped beyond the role of Balmar beta tester to Balmar apologist. RC’s biggest asset, whether he realizes it or not, is his impartiality and not just his technical information. If he loses his impartiality, the technical information loses credibility.

  36. All,

    I am away for the office for the week, but I wanted to address the delays in the BT gateway. Due to a variety of issues, the development has taken way longer than we initially planned for. Rest assured we have been working on it diligently. We are now in beta testing, and crossing fingers it will be released sooner than later. I don’t want to insult anyone with a date, but it should be well before anyone points back to this email and says “Chris said….” To Leslie, I know you and I were in communications some months ago, my apologies for not giving you an update.

    • John says:

      Thanks for the update, Chris, especially since you are on vacation. A regular email blast to registered users costs nothing and would go a long way in customer care.

      I confess I find it remarkable that you could work on something so simple for so long. Is this really just a BT dongle development, or is something more going on?

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published.