Wave WiFi MBR, a Swiss Army knife of a boat router

The Wave WiFi MBR-550 with one of the optional LTE antennas

Internet afloat isn’t always as simple as we would like, but Wave WiFi is working hard to make it simpler with their MBR-500 and MBR-550 multi-source routers.  These devices can select between as many as six different sources of internet connectivity and they can do it all automatically.

Panbo’s coverage of Wave WiFi began back in 2010 when Ben E’s review of the Rogue Wave WiFi bridge noted the user-friendly interface software that Wave had flashed onto commodity hardware which was also kitted out for Marine use.  More recently I used the Rogue Pro DB as the benchmark for simplicity in comparing user interfaces.  In the almost nine years since Ben’s first review, the user interface (UI) has gotten more powerful, prettier and even easier to use.  Wave knows you’re going to use their products on a boat and it shows from their user interface to the mounting options and support, unlike the highly capable hardware — but with much more confusing user interfaces — from companies like Ubiquiti and Engenius.

Wave offers the $1,000 MBR-500 and the $1,500 MBR-550, and the only difference between the two routers is the addition of cellular-LTE capabilities in the MBR-550. With the MBR product name standing for marine broadband router, these are multi-source (WiFi, cellular, satellite, etc) routers in a rugged housing with a friendly user interface designed for boat use.  Both models include a 2.4ghz-only WiFi radio for the local (boat) network, five 10/100 megabit Ethernet ports, and the MBR-550 also includes an LTE-A radio.  If you want to use a marina WiFi network as your internet source, you will also need to have a WiFi bridge — and if that bridge is one of Wave’s models, like a Wave Rogue, a link appears that makes managing the WiFi connection pretty seamless.

Why these routers?

The main interface dashboard of an MBR

It’s a natural question as these routers start at about $850 street price and work up to around $1,300.   There are mainstream products that do the same thing for a lot less money, so why these routers?  The short answer is features designed for use in changing situations, ease of installation, ease of use and support.  You’re paying a premium for a product that is intended to be used on a boat and developed for just that purpose.  When you call Wave  WiFi’s technical support they’re going to be familiar with the way you’re using their product on your boat.  With Wave WiFi’s products, you have the benefit of an installer network who knows Wave’s products and proper installation procedures onboard your boat.

I’m frequently asked by people with good technology skills why they should spend the extra money on a boat specific product.  My normal answer is if you can identify the solution you want to use, figure out all the components needed to mount it on a boat and then configure it, there’s probably no reason for you to buy a marine specific product.  You’ve just done a lot of what you’re paying a company like Wave WiFi to do.  But, if you don’t want to roll your own solution, do want a phone number to dial when things don’t work, and maybe would like a marine pro to install it, a product like an MBR is right up your alley.

There’s also a lot of features baked into these routers aimed at solving problems encountered onboard a boat without a wire connecting the boat to the internet.  The biggest difference between home internet and internet connections aboard a boat is the constantly changing nature of your internet connection.  Even if you use the same cellular connection most of the time, you may find yourself in a new location where that connection isn’t performing well.  But perhaps there’s good WiFi or another carrier with better coverage, so you will want to switch your internet source.  Most of the general purpose routers capable of multiple WAN connections (Wide Area Network, in this case internet connections) — like the Ubiquiti Edge Router or a PepLink BR1 — can automatically select between a maximum of two internet connections and don’t make that selection nearly as straightforward as the MBR.  Plus, the MBRs include a lot of traffic management features to help your potentially limited bandwidth go further.



Installation and configuration

The hardest part of installing an MBR will likely be running cables through your boat.  Both routers have two antennas for the 2.4ghz client WiFi network and the MBR-550 has two more antennas for the LTE radio.   The MBRs come with short rubber antennas for both radio connections but Wave has external LTE antennas with 1″- #14 threads for $130.  Using the external antennas can significantly improve your cellular reception because of the higher gain of the larger antennas and the ability to locate them up high on the boat for best performance.  Using the external antennas requires a run of FR-240 cables from your MBR mounting location to the antenna or antennas.

My review unit came with a 110v power supply, though the unit itself takes a 12v input, so directly powering from your boat’s 12v system is easy.  I then connected a Wave Rogue Pro DB dual-band WiFi bridge for connecting to marina and land-based WiFi networks.  Unfortunately, the MBR won’t power a connected Rogue or Rogue Pro directly (as a Ubiquiti Edge Router can) so you will need to use a separate POE power injector.

Once the router is installed and cabled up the initial configuration is fairly minimal.  The routers come with interfaces set so that the leftmost port is the guest LAN (Local Area Network — this one is a guest network for visitors to your boat), the next one is set as VSAT, then cellular, WiFi and then the main LAN (AKA your boat network where you connect your devices) connection.  Failover priorities are preset so that WiFi (the cheapest means of connectivity) is first, then Cellular, then VSAT.  You will now need to make a couple of choices about how users connect to the MBR and what bandwidth they will receive — more on that below.

Configuring ports

Each port on the device can be configured by clicking on the port icons across the top of the screen above.  This screen shows two of the features that differentiate the MBR from most general purpose routers.  First, the “Auto Priority #” option above sets the order in which the router will use internet connections when it’s in automatic mode.  The second feature is the ability to limit the usage of an internet connection by gigabytes transferred.  If you have a connection with limited bandwidth and extra charges for going over your limit this feature can be a real lifesaver.

A neat trick (that I haven’t seen documented anywhere) is the ability to use the USB port on the front of the MBR to connect a mobile hotspot to the MBR and control it as another internet source in the MBR.  I have both AT&T and Verizon sim cards on the boat and carrier branded hotspots for both networks.  I’ve mostly settled on using the AT&T SIM inserted into the MBR-550 while connecting the Verizon 7730L mobile hotspot to the USB port.  This gives me easy access to both cellular networks and marina WiFi, plus it means that if a carrier starts using a band outside of the coverage of the LTE radio built into the MBR-550 I can always use a carrier device attached via USB (though I would lose the goodness of the higher gain antennas and better antenna location).

Connecting users



The MBRs both have extensive capabilities for managing users on the boat’s network.  The router can behave like your home router by giving all users access to as much bandwidth and as many gigabytes of throughput as they can consume (and your internet connection can supply) but you can also configure limits for some or all users.  As you can see in the pulldown menu above, you have the choice of allowing users to authenticate by MAC address (the Media Access Control address is an identifier of the Ethernet or WiFi adapter of every device on a network) or via login code.

Access control by MAC address simply allows or disallows access for a device.  But, if you use login codes there’s a lot of granularity in the limits you can set.  You can limit the download and upload rate permitted in megabits per second as well as the amount of data transferred in gigabytes.  Codes can be set to be one-time use or with a cycle that resets between every 30 minutes and every 30 days.

Managing Access Points

The MBR has a 2.4ghz WiFi radio built-in for client device connections (devices on your boat connecting to the local network) and the ability to manage additional Wave WiFi Yacht APs.  If I had a Yacht AP connected to the MBR it would show up as another radio under the settings for the internal radio.  I really like the ability to manage multiple access points from a single interface, but unfortunately right now both the internal radio on the MBR and the Yacht APs are limited to only the 2.4ghz band.  I’ve found it very difficult to get reliable connections in the congested 2.4ghz band aboard Have Another Day.

How’s it work?

The MBRs deliver on the promise of a simpler user interface and a feature set designed for how you will use the product on your boat.  There was minimal configuration required to get the router up, running and managing my connections.  Of the configuration options I’ve shown above, the only thing necessary to get traffic flowing is selecting which connection the MBR should be using for internet connectivity.  All the other settings can be adjusted if you have a need for those features but can also be left at the default settings.

I’ve had my evaluation MBR onboard Have Another Day for our cruise from Chicago to Florida.  Although I initially had some troubles with stability requiring the router be rebooted with some regularity, it has been reliable since a firmware update installed towards the end of March.  Compared to a general purpose product from a company like Linksys or Netgear, these routers are produced in very small numbers and the budgets for development and QA are naturally smaller.  So there is a greater potential for issues like I experienced.  This is part of the tradeoff for some of the marine specific features I’ve mentioned.



The speed test results shown above are using the MBR-550’s internal radio with two of Wave WiFi’s funnel style LTE antennas connected.  These results are on par with or better than what I get using an AT&T branded Netgear Nighthawk mobile router.

I’ve found the automatic failover capabilities to work well as long as there’s complete failure of the in-use connection.  The router makes its failover decisions by testing to see if it can ping a server.  As long as those pings come back the router will stay connected.  This proves to be an effective technique if you’ve connected to marina WiFi and pull out of the marina or if one cellular provider loses service while another still has it.

Final thoughts

If you want a simple solution that just works and is designed for the peculiarities of internet connectivity aboard a boat these routers deliver.  There are cheaper options available in all-in-one dome products like the Shakespeare WebWatch and Glomex’s WebBoat (both of which are installed aboard Have Another Day and I’m also testing) and the even cheaper option of constructing your own solution from general purpose hardware.  However, none of these products deliver the flexibility, nor the elegantly simple user interface of the MBRs.

So, with their easy to use software and flexible feature sets these really are the Swiss Army knives of boat routers.

Similar Posts:


Onboard WiFi hotspot, Rogue Wave & WirieAP
September 9, 2011

Rogue Wave WiFi, the Bullet rules
October 11, 2010

NautiCloud, 2 Ubiquiti Bullets = high power WiFi contender?
August 20, 2012

Onboard WiFi and cell booster strategies, the diagrams
April 6, 2015

Ben Stein

Ben Stein

Publisher of Panbo.com, passionate marine electronics enthusiast, completed the Great Loop in 2017.

16 Responses

  1. It’s great to see marine-specific vendors start delivering higher quality solutions for on-board networking. I’ve used Wave’s WiFi boosters in the past, and their software is very nice. This one looks even better.

    However, there is one big hole – the lack of 5Ghz for the internal AP. 5Ghz has been around for over 5 years, and is the standard that most newer hardware works best with. In fact, I cannot use 2.4Ghz in my home marina, and at least 2 other marinas due to channel contention and interference. It sounds like you are having similar challenges 🙂

    I also think only having one SIM slot is a limitation, but not one that would prevent me from purchasing it. All of the other $1000+ systems I’ve tested have this. Yes, you can tether a USB device but that is not the same as having one built in for ease of switching and rules and safety.

    Hopefully someone will come out with a marine-specific solution that has 5Ghz as well as the rest of the features. This one sure comes close!

  2. Jason says:

    Does it work in Europe? Or is it like glomex where I have to buy a different model

  3. Richard says:

    I can always tell when my neighbor in the anchorage has a Wave product. My internet speed drops. With the “user-friendly interface software” having the “Output Power” set to it’s highest, it wipes out everyone else. There are many Caribbean WiFi providers that are tired of the complaints from non-Wave users because they think it’s due to the provider. WAVE should change this in their software and allow the user to lower the power so ALL the boaters in the field can get decent speeds. I know that one provider has contacted WAVE and they don’t seem to care.

    • Leftbrainstuff says:

      I’ve never met anyone who would willingly lower their wifi power for the benefit of others. I think that is wishful thinking. Give a human an internet connection and they will turn into psychos to protect it.

      It’s the age old problem of telco providers not able or willing to keep up with demand, older hardware and software that buffers and of course wifi is highly dependent on radio propogation path.

      While 5G is nice it is significantly degraded by masts, rigging and distance of most berths from the 5g tower. We spent time in a PNW marina equipped with a very good commercial system. (owner was a CFO of a telco) . I spent significant time mapping the wifi quality. The service would still be considered poor, with massive variability compared to land based solutions. Older hardware (routers, smart tvs, etc) can be problematic in how they persist connections. They simply do not play well with connection swapping.

      We are seeing significant interest and investment in smaller satellites. Ultiimately all yacht internet and cellular comms will be via LEO and MEO satellite. Much less issues with line of sight but weather will remain a significant QoS variable.

      We have redundancy between all our cellular, wifi, fixed line and satellite connections. I’ve avoided the fully integrated option as swapping between cellular and wifi, rarely offers QoS for real time comms. Most of our systems are asynchronous including our digital business.

      • Grant Jenkins says:

        What Richard is referring to, and rightly so, is the NEEDLESS overpowering of the AP by individuals using devices with “user-friendly” interfaces, that do not allow for adjustment to the EIRP. Broadcasting at full-power when there is already a strong signal available does nothing to improve the connection of the unwitting offender, but DOES in fact degrade the connection of everyone else using the same AP. I posted another comment on this here with an appropriate analogy –
        https://www.panbo.com/using-a-wifi-bridge-to-connect-your-boat-to-the-internet-interfaces-compared/

        User-friendly is great, as far as it goes – but it really ought to have an auto-adjustment feature that automatically adjusts output power to match the available signal strength by default –

  4. Anonymous says:

    There are way to many « but » combined with reliability issue for the price. I am suprised the product is recommended. Usually I like that this site will express mixed opinions.

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      Anonymous,

      I can appreciate your conclusion there are too many buts with the MBRs, but (another one!) I do think that of the current options out there it is one of the strongest contenders.

      Stability was a concern early on in the testing, however, over the last several months I have seen very good results with the router just chugging along.

      I do agree whole-heartedly with Steve that I wish the client side WiFi network was 2.4 & 5ghz. On my boat I’ve solved that with a $90 Ubiquiti access point placed in a strategic location that covers the entire boat nicely.

      If you are comfortable building your own solution you can certainly put something together for less money. In the products designed and marketed for the marine market Wave comes in at a competitive price with a nice feature set and easy to use interface. It’s based on that criteria that I give it favorable marks.

      Ben

  5. DouglasP says:

    Thanks for the review and great that it has good software and interface BUT:
    No 5ghz????
    For $ 1,500.00?
    Serious?
    A number of marinas these days are letting their 2.4 die on the vine *IF* they have well supported 5ghz.
    Sunset Bay in Stuart is a great example. The 5ghz is very, very good at almost all slips, meaning your phone or tablet or even Smart TV has no issues with the 5ghz, can stream faster at the waterline, inside your hull next to your microwave, from the 5ghz antenna a few slip away, than it can from the 2.4 coming thru your router that’s getting it’s signal from the end of the dock.
    No incentive for a marina to “fix/improve” the 2.4 if no one is using it..
    I have a perfectly serviceable Coastal Marine WiFi unit that I bought in 2015 at Ben’s recommendation that works great ***IF*** the 2.4 has strength and bandwidth. and adding cellular with a stick or jetpack works just fine for me.
    But at Sunset, I don’t even bother to turn it on…..
    So a $1k or worse $1.5k price point without 5ghz?
    Not for me.
    That said, when it comes out as DUAL BAND, I’ll happily pay the higher-end ticket.

  6. Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

    Douglas,

    There’s an important detail I think you’re missing here. The MBRs don’t do the WAN side WiFi bridging. The expectation is you will plug in a WiFi bridge for that purpose. So, if dual-band is important to you (and I fully agree it should be) you simply use a dual-band WiFi bridge.

    The 2.4ghz only WiFi I referenced is the client side network (your devices connected to your router) and that too can be easily worked around with a dual-band access point. I also agree it’s disappointing that’s not standard at this point but I’ve noticed nearly all the marine WiFi folks missing this important detail.

    Ben S.

    • DouglasP says:

      Hi Ben,
      Thanks for the clarification. Obviously, I missed that WAN side bit!

      But now I think feel it’s even more expensive for what you don’t get! 😉
      Doug

  7. Matt says:

    Late to the game here, but why not something like the Mikrotik wAP AC 4G? Absolutely not as turnkey as a Wave, but a tenth of the price with the same features and a weatherproof enclosure.

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      There’s no question that cheaper (a LOT cheaper in many cases) solutions can be found. If you have the know-how to assemble and configure a solution you should probably go that route. If you want a marine installer to perform the installation, a company that answers the phone and understands how you use the product to support you and don’t want to design or think about your solution then something like the MBR makes a lot of sense.

      Also, the wAP 4G line is only an LTE connectivity device. There’s not the multi-wan functionality that can add to the set it and forget it use of the MBR.

      -Ben S.

  8. Dartanyon says:

    This certainly just looks like the are repackaging the Mofi routers, which are great by the way at 1/3 the price. We’ve had one for years. Even the software actually looks like they just plopped their name in the corner. (https://mofinetwork.com/)

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      I don’t believe MoFi is making their hardware either. I’m pretty sure both are buying OEM hardware from a third party. I’ve used both products and can tell you that while I believe the hardware is the same the software and support are quite different.

  1. May 20, 2019

    […] The content for this post was sourced from http://www.panbo.com […]

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published.