Panbo

Verizon 4G WiFi hotspot, Novatel MiFi 4510L

Sep 27, 2011
Verizon_LTE_MiFi.jpg

My experience having Verizon-provided internet access over cellular data protocols to my cruising sailboat spans three years and five devices, the Verizon 4G LTE MiFi built by Novetel released this summer being the most current. They've worked well enough that I've never messed with a high power boat WiFi system, like Ben has, but they are not perfect...

Mobile hotspots are gadgets a little bigger than credit cards that combine a mobile broadband modem with a WiFi router to allow computers and other devices to get onto the internet across distances of 20 miles and more. They have upfront and monthly data plan costs very similar in price to a smartphone. 

My first experience surfing the internet through Verizon was in the days before mobile hotspots were available. Back then it was with a tiny card I installed as an option into my wife's Lenovo ThinkPad laptop and a Verizon USB dongle I used for my own laptop. Both used a cellular protocol called EvDO with average data transfer speeds in the 1 Mbps down, and ½ Mbps up range. Three years ago I found it consistently much faster than the Wi-Fi signals barely in range of my boat despite a powerful Wi-Fi access point provided by the cable company nearby. In addition, the Verizon product received a strong signal out in the middle of Long Island Sound and virtually every anchorage I visited between New York and Maine (see my reviews in www.activecaptain.com)

They also worked well below decks in my Beneteau sailboat, easily penetrating the fiberglass to get a connection. Compared to a Rogue Wave or WireAP, there is literally nothing to install, as both devices would draw power from the computer they were installed in.

As good as that sounds, there was a major hassle in using the included software for the hardware. If the laptop went into a deep sleep to save power, or I closed the lid, the EvDO connection did not recover, sometimes requiring a reboot. The software also interfered with the primary benefit of the USB dongle to share the hardware and data plan between computers, because installing that Verizon client on the next computer took time, required learning that specific computer's idiosyncrasies in switching between internet sources and involved training the user borrowing the USB dongle on how to switch their laptop back to wired or Wi-Fi internet access.

The arrival of the original Novatel MiFi Hotspot to the Verizon network fixed all that. The MiFi replaced software and a physical connection between the cellular transceiver and the laptop, with a built in Wi-Fi hotspot capability to connect up to 5 computers at a time to the Verizon Cellular EvDO network. This made using Verizon much simpler, as Wi-Fi was already configured on my laptop and that of my co-workers. Switching internet sources was no different than switching between WiFi access points. It was now easy to setup and share my data plan.

Life was good until the Droid series of Smartphones became popular, later joined by the iPhone for Verizon, both of which used the same EvDO protocol and frequencies.

At first I enjoyed accessing EvDO from my phone, first a Motorola Droid and later a Droid 2. My Droid 2 incidentally had the same hotspot capability as my MiFi, but I used it rarely as you can't talk at the same time, also the MiFi could run five hours on a charge and my Droid could not.

But, my enjoyment of EvDO on both devices fell sharply as hundreds of Droids began competing with mine for the same EvDO bandwidth.  Rather than having 1 Mbps of bandwidth, which was more than enough for web conferencing and Skype, the speeds I typically experienced dropped to under 100 Kbps, just 10% of the original speed I once enjoyed.

That brings us to the Verizon 4G LTE network and the hotspot from Novatel (Verizon also offers a hotspot from Samsung, a comparison of the two available here). Verizon has a whole new network (click here for a coverage map), using the LTE protocol it markets as 4G (4th generation) with a speed 10x that of 3G. As a new network with few users, it is very fast. I potentially face disappointment a year or two in the future as millions of new devices use this protocol as well, but at the moment life is good again for connecting my laptop to the internet. The laptop incidently does not need to be upgraded or modified in anyway.

With the Verizon 4G LTE Hotspot from Novatel (above) I have access to both the LTE network when it's available, and the EvDO network as a fallback. The advertised speed of Verizon's 4G LTE is up to 10 times faster than 3G EvDO, but with EvDO loaded and LTE near empty, I can measure speeds of 70 to 100 times faster. Ten times faster is all I need.

The 4G Novatel hotspot hardware has some improvements over the original 3G Novatel hardware. One of the small differences is the addition of a status display to show battery charge state and signal strength. This is important as the battery life is so much shorter (barely 90 minutes) vs the older MiFi (5 hours). This 4G LTE version can also be charged with the same 12v boat charger or USB cable I have for my Droid phone, rather than a proprietary adapter the 3G required.

I am cautious that my renewed ability to stay connected while on my boat is in jeopardy, however. Even with 10x the bandwidth, someday there will be millions of new devices using this network as happened with EvDO. With a forecast of 120 million new iPhones to be sold in the next year, I am crossing my fingers that the iPhone 5 doesn't support LTE, as that could hold off the masses for a year. When this Verizon network and it's equivalent network from AT&T, SPRINT, and others become saturated, it's not clear what frequencies will next be available to support another 20+ Mbps of bandwidth per wireless carrier. 

Actually, I am more than a little cautious. No offense Verizon & Novatel, but I have to say I cannot recommend this or Samsung's dedicated hotspot product in combination with an LTE (or EvDO) data plan, because it is likely each user will be stuck midway thru a two year subscription plan paying $50 a month for a product that will be very slow as EvDO has become.

What I can recommend, is purchasing a Verizon LTE compatible smart phone with hotspot capability. Why?  First, the hotspot capability can be activated for an additional $20 a month on such a phone, no seperate device needed.  Second, you can then elect to discontinue using the hotspot feature at any point the data rate gets too slow. The basic data plan you would still retain on your phone will still be useful to check email and run other apps that work well on low bandwidth, just as my Droid 2 works well even on slow EvDO. Finally, unlike EvDO where the phone can only do one at a time, be a hotspot or let you talk, LTE based smart phones are suppose to be capable of acting as a hotspot and a phone simultaneously. That leaves battery life as the only advantage of the dedicated hotspot. But, for a $30 a month premium I would rather carry a battery powered charger around instead.

Al least for my laptop and I, happy days are here again... until people learn about the Verizon 4G LTE network and millions start sharing the network with me. I mean, I am okay with sharing it with you and other Panbots, but listen, you gotta keep this quiet at least for awhile or I will have to go thru the time and expense to install a Wi-Fi booster for my boat.

- Dan Corcoran is an avid sailor and leads ServiceSPAN, a back office work center technology and process improvement company.

Verizon_LTE_phones_w_hotspot_Sept_2011.jpg

Comments

Dan,
Nice write up.
I use several broadband devices - currently a Verizon Pantech USB plugged into a Cradlepoint. My problem with the Mifi is having to carry another charger in my laptop bag. I can not tell you how many times the Mifi has run out of battery and I plug a USB device into my laptop. I can charge the Mifi from my laptop but not when using it, it does not seem to charge. The Verizon LTE signal is very strong around the cities but on the water - not so much. Even in the Baltimore harbor, my Sprint EVDO is faster than the Verizon devices. On land in Baltimore, the Verizon LTE devices totally kick butt. The Sprint WiMax is close but still not LTE. The Sprint pricing plans tend to be less restrictive on usage than Verizon.

Posted by: HenryD Author Profile Page at September 27, 2011 9:59 PM | Reply

Dan,
I upgraded from a Verizon 3G aircard to a 4G in December 2010 the first week the 4G network went live. I use a Pantech UML290 and use it heavily in Washington,DC pushing up to 10G/month through it with 13G being a monthly maximum. I use it with a Lenovo T410 fairly fast laptop. I don't know how to measure as precisely as you do so the following anecdotes will have to suffice to demonstrate that the feared slowdown due to incremental users is already upon us. In December 2010 in DC, pulling up a web site or downloading an e-mail with 15MB of attachments felt just like I was working on a cable modem. Since then, performance with the computer in exactly the same place, has fairly significantly degraded. There is no resemblance to a cable modem any more. Plus, I am getting knocked off very frequently. I spend a lot of time deep within a large concrete building which is not a good aircard operating environment and strongly suspect that I am one of the weaker signals and therefore, more at risk of being dropped as I suspect the network prioritizes for stronger signals. Now, after 3/4 of a year, this is still better than my 3G aircard but no where near what it was before use of the network increased. I should add that there are 1 to 5 of us using these devices (including the 4G MiFi) in the same area at any one time and we all are experiencing what I have described and not sinmply when all 5 of us are there.

Jim

Posted by: Jim McCrea at September 27, 2011 11:20 PM | Reply

Dan,

Thanks a lot. I am at the replace my Droid, install WiFi boost crossroads with a must decide date three weeks away. Very, Very helpful.

Posted by: Christopher Author Profile Page at September 28, 2011 9:00 AM | Reply

I have one of these, which I upgraded from the original MiFi2200. While I found the 2200 to have some serious problems in terms of the radios and the software, the 4510L has been stellar. The software works. The radios pick up much better than the 2200 does, and of course the speed is many times faster.

Additionally, the 4510L has one important feature that the 2200 doesn't -- an external antenna port. This means that when away from shore (but still within site of a tower), connectivity can be maintained from a much greater distance. At cellular frequencies, "boosting" the signal is usually not enough to counter distance, because curvature-of-the-earth is the limiting factor. By going to a higher antenna, a distance advantage is obtained. The external antenna port on the 4510L makes this a good option, whereas the 2200's lack of such a port meant that one had to use stick-on "inductive" pick up antenna couplers, which are problematic.

Two thumbs up from me. We'll see what happens if the network slows down, but for now, it's 3+Mbps for me. The new 4G plan is cheaper than the old plan too, and has better overage charges.

Dan

Posted by: Dan Freedman Author Profile Page at September 28, 2011 10:44 AM | Reply

Hi Dan,

Great writeup - on and near shore, I've had good luck using my Verizon iPhone as a hotspot, with very consistent speeds and reliability.

Of course as soon as you leave cellular coverage, satellite is the way to go. I think the new Iridium AxcessPoint Wi-Fi device, and AxcessPoint Mail & Web service is worth mentioning as it's a game-changer for satellite data. The device, about the size of a deck of cards, connects to an Iridium 9555 or Iridium Extreme phone and creates a Wi-Fi hotspot that broadcasts up to 100 feet. Because the uncompressed rate is 9600 kbps, Iridium is offering free "AxcessPoint Mail&Web" software for email and web-browsing compression. It uses the GMN XGate engine which has been covered here at Panbo, and it compatible with Windows 7, Vista and XP, Mac and even iOS devices - iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch.

http://www.globalmarinenet.com/iridium-axcesspoint-wifi-device.php

Full disclosure: I'm with GMN, makers of XGate, and retailers of the AxcessPoint device.

Posted by: John Dark at September 28, 2011 11:51 AM | Reply

Our experience with the 4510L has been similar to Dan Freedman's. I connected the 110V charger to the boats inverter, so battery life is not an issue. And I installed the remote antenna up on the radar arch. Now we have a continuous internet connection while we cruise the ICW.

We have a Rogue Wave too, and it works well, but the mifi is just more convenient.

So far, the 3G speed is fast, and the 4G is even faster. The only down side is that we had to sign a 2 year contract to get it at a reasonable price. I am sure that this unit will be hopelessly obsolete before the 2 years are up.

Posted by: Rick R Author Profile Page at September 30, 2011 10:00 PM | Reply

I got the Verizon Pantech 4G UML290 for my month long vacation last month as I sailed from Morro Bay to Catalina Island in the southern calif area. VERY disappointed and ended up returning it. Had trouble keeping it connected even when in a harbor on the main land. Next year I will try what you suggested and just get a phone that can create a hotspot. I thought of even using a Wilson cell phone booster so I could see if I could get service out at the islands some 20 miles off shore.

Posted by: Wayne at October 5, 2011 1:56 PM | Reply

Well my boating area just got Verizon 700MHz LTE turned on a few days ago. So I already have in addition to the Ericsson W35 on HSPA+ w/AT&T and the Wave WiFi/GeoSat full EC/ER/HP bothwith external antennas soon LTE. I had to add a 2nd directional antenna to the WiFi unit because there are so many Xfinity Hotspots, MIFI's, Home router/AP's in addition to the HotSpots I have installed that I actually see too many Hotspots so I use a 12VDC Tohstu microwave N connector relay to switch betwen the 9dbi Omni or the hand rotated radome enclosed Log Periodic made by Terrawave. This really cleaned up my ability to increase speed and range of the WiFi because I have better signal to noise with the directional antenna pattern over the Omni.
I had a Samsung 290 into a Cradlepoint router (with the latest software) in the boat but only had EVDO service there. My set up for LTE is with the latest MIMO 700-2200MHz Omni I will be installing before launching sometime in March. I had previously used the CradlePoint with the Samsung 290 USB stick on EVDO and a Digital 563W antenna but ended up putting it in my primary vehicle (SUV) instead. The Ericsson W35 would blow the Verizon EVDO away using HSPA+ that won't be the case for sometime now that Verizon 700MHz LTE has arrived in my primary boating area. I will still keep the W-35 as a backup plus the phone line you pay for on all data plans but don't usually get and for areas where VZW hasn't built LTE yet. Many of the speed issues you talk about are percieved as lack of spectrum. It may not be the of lack of spectrum but actually having the proper backhaul as the number of users increase and adding addition incumbent and recently purchased frequency bands using the LTE as the signalling platform. Speed on LTE is also dependent on SINR because LTE uses adaptive advanced modulation schemes meaning depending on your signal quality you could be running at 16QUAM or up to 256QUAM. My point is increased number of users and speeds slowing down are not always for lack of occupying "key word" incumbent bands not the lack of them. Verizon just bought the 4 biggest East Coast cable companies frequencies. Look for them as the LTE device deployment gets larger to deploy on those bands and revieve that currently unused spectrum. That is why it's called LTE because it has a migration path for a larger number of users and the frequency bands are still not being deployed and possibly properly used. Also Verizon as it can phase out EVDO will surely relace it with LTE. However 1X-RTT is a very effective use for voice. I'm not sure that will go away as quick as converting EVDOrev.A data users to LTE through incentives. Once they clear those legacy users they will have more spectrum to place LTE in. EVDO is a pretty bandwidth intesnsive channel for what it gives the end user in the way of speed. A quick example a single carrier EVDO sector with 1 standard EVDO bandwidth will only support 60 simultanios data sessions.
This reminds me of when Verizon and AT&T tried to get rid of analog it took almost a decade between getting an FCC sunset date and to convert the hold outs for it to happen. The same could be said for EVDO users or HSPA+ users depending on the carrier.
Bill

Posted by: Bill at December 25, 2011 5:09 PM | Reply

Wayne if your talking about LTE Wilson currently has no 700MHz FDD LTE amplifiers or external antnnas for marine applications. The USB modem you are using is supposed to be run off a small USB extension cable and you have to make sure you have the latest connection manager software in the USB stick and OS in your computer. Also if you order the antenna jumper make sure you have it in the main 4G port there are 2 external antenna ports on the ULM290. Now if you are talking about using the 290 on 3G it would depend where your system donor antenna is in relation to hieght above average terrain or the sea level with your 800 & PCS Wilson system currently installed. Again Wilson makes no 12VDC 700MHz FDD LTE el cheapo mini repeaters.
Bill

Posted by: Bill at December 25, 2011 5:19 PM | Reply

I need to correct my post above Wilson and CellPhone Mate both have 700MHz LTE amplifiers. The 3G store has a U-Tube video of both in operation. I have to admit the video appears like these small form 700MHz LTE amplifiers work very well. I am still going with my UML290 Pantec and a Cradlepoint CTR35 for 700MHz LTE with external antennas. I started testing tonight using my UML290 Pantec USB modem, Cradlepoint CTR35 router/mini AP with the latest management control panel and a nice radome enclosed quad band low gain Omni made by Cellphone Mate. It looks like a pair will go on my hardtop this Spring. They have an LMR240 cable kit and adapters for almost every 3G/4G modem. The cable kit is 20 feet terminated cable with an N male connector for the antenna and an FME female that makes fishing the wire easy and it directly connects with most modem FME male jumpers the 3G store sells. I'm not usually crazy about places like this but give them a look if you want 3G/4G operation on your vessel. A nice feature they have is the modem/router once connected to the internet looks for their latest software updates. Mine did an update automatically when I provisioned it.
Happy New Year,
Bill Lentz

Posted by: Bill Lentz at December 31, 2011 11:37 PM | Reply

Bill & Wayne. You lost me. Why is an antenna for 4G necessary/desirable on a boat? Like 3G EvDO, the 4G LTE signal travels great distances (unlike WiFi) and pentrates fiberglass boats (and brick walls for that matter).

Posted by: Dan Corcoran (b393capt) Author Profile Page at January 1, 2012 5:05 PM | Reply

"Bill & Wayne. You lost me. Why is an antenna for 4G necessary/desirable on a boat? Like 3G EvDO, the 4G LTE signal travels great distances (unlike WiFi) and pentrates fiberglass boats (and brick walls for that matter)."

Actually you are quite wrong. While cellular signals can travel greater distances then WiFi your hull still has almost the same attenuation and blockage. Why would you need an external antenna for HF SSB by the same logic? Why would you need an external VHF antenna not just a rubber duck out of you marine VHF radio?

An external antenna will help especially with data communications where signal to noise ratio is very important. Also any 3G or 4G cellular MiFi or USB modems at best have a compromise (internal) antenna due to the devices physical size, it's best to seperate the electronics from the antenna. The MiFi might work better if you could place it in on a mast high above the waterline but that wouldn't be practical. This is why a good in band external antenna is more practical.
Bill

Posted by: Bill Lentz at January 1, 2012 9:20 PM | Reply

I don’t see it that way, from experience in over 20 harbors.

Yes, when it comes to Wi-Fi an external antenna is a somewhere between a big plus and a must have.

Comparatively, the EVDO 3G MiFi reception is good as evidence I get all the bars even from the inside of my boat, and putting it up on deck does nothing to add bars or throughput. The very few times I had an issue (e.g. it was raining hard, or I was 20+ miles from a tower) was too infrequent to go thru the cost and effort to mount an antenna.

If attenuation by the hull is an issue for other users (steel hull ?), you can throw the MiFi up on deck above a window, run off the internal battery, and let the built in hotspot capability downlink to your PC below.

Yes?

Posted by: Dan Corcoran (b393capt) Author Profile Page at January 2, 2012 11:41 PM | Reply

Different frequency bands have different characteristics. VHF travels further outdoors but does not penetrate structures very well. UHF doesn't travel as far but does penetrate structures better. WiFi was designed, believe it or not, not to go very far. Even with a Hotspot System the power levels allowed are designed to not go very far to minimize interference.

Cellular bands are changing for LTE at current with GSM / UMTS / HSPA(+) you can work with a Quad Band (or quad band + 2100 Mhz) antenna. But LTE is introducing the "White Spaces" old TV channels frequencies and 700 Mhz becomes important. (among other frequency bands e.g. AWS 1.7 Ghz / 2.1 Ghz is interesting?)

We're trying to get Ericsson and others to release 4G Cellular Terminals (with the nice phone jacks for PBX and such) but so far what's available they are holding tight onto for a Rural Cellular Company Alliance. There are supposedly Verizon and AT&T backward compatible 4G systems ... supposedly pending Cellular Carrier approval. Depending on how they manufacture them the frequency band / compatibility issue becomes important as well. See the tab about this on my blog.

I would like to get more Members to our own Alliance (I don't have to "own" this alliance) for Marine 4G LTE ... to be able to show some larger numbers to the Cellular Equipment Manufacturers.

As others have mentioned there are some equipments on the market to do 4G LTE that can be put on marine vessels ... it's still pretty new - which might explain why the Verizon side is getting the gear before the AT&T GSM backward compatible side. There is also the concern about it working outside of the U.S. Which is why the backward compatible part is important as well.

Posted by: Alan Spicer Author Profile Page at May 4, 2012 1:00 PM | Reply

Leave a comment